drift-index

azrael_crying

03/11/2041 at 22:09

such an evocative scene again... and so texturally rich... like a photograph being meticulously copied with an airbrush...

yyatima

03/11/2041 at 23:52

its the color scheme also...

zer0c00l

04/11/2041 at 01:11

YES! .. where have i seen this before? i feel like i should know this.. or maybe its the textural quality that is reminiscent of something... these soft edges that seem sharp?

yyatima

04/11/2041 at 22:38

what is this device? some sort of probe or emitter ?

⊡ C.B-2.2::C.E-3.2

zer0c00l

04/11/2041 at 23:38

yeah this makes me think its some kind of science experiment.. like scanning soil layers or something like that...

yyatima

05/11/2041 at 13:19

and what is this person holding in their hand?

⊡ B.C.D-2.4.1::B.D.E-2.5.1

zer0c00l

06/11/2041 at 16:42

yeah they're the only one standing.. as if they're somehow in command of all the rest... like they're guiding their meditation or enchanting all of them?

azrael_crying

10/11/2041 at 19:14

the way this grass is rendered here is so beautiful...

⊡ A.C-3.1::C.A-3.5

yyatima

10/11/2041 at 19:29

these long shadows dont correspond to the position of the light source tho.. but its really visually effective, yes.

yyatima

10/11/2041 at 20:24

but are all these other shapes in the grass even really people? it doesnt look like it.. what is this?

⊡ C.C.B-3.3.2::D.E.B-4.1.1

zer0c00l

14/11/2041 at 07:54

yeah at first glance i thought this was a bike one of these people left in the grass or something like that but i dont know.. maybe all these shapes are something else entirely, you're right. none of them are really distinctly people.

azrael_crying

14/11/2041 at 09:02

i sometimes get so confused by these kinds of conversations... we're all talking as if theres a definitive answer somewhere... all of those interpretations are correct and none of them are... there was no actual intent behind any of this, nothing was meant, no message, no point... .. its just some sort of statistical approximation, a random segment of the probability field or something? right? so what are we talking about?

zer0c00l

14/11/2041 at 10:51

well i mean.. this is a can of worms..
i guess you're right that theres a problem with how these conversations are phrased. there really is no definitive answer here and no ultimate mystery to solve... but even if nothing was really meant.. something was nonetheless conveyed.. or i dont know if thats the right word for it but there is something... not a message and not meaning in the conventional sense but its something.. and we're all reacting to it and basically comparing our reactions, right?

azrael_crying

14/11/2041 at 11:54

well ok i suppose i just object to the phrasing that seems inaccurate or misleading. and i suppose theres no real way around it yet but i feel like we could try? i mean what is it that we're talking about really? its like we're all seeing different things like in a rorschach test or something.. so why does it seem like thats not the predominant tone?

yyatima

14/11/2041 at 12:27

i would also say that in a certain sense the intent, meaning, message or point never really were solid in the way you seem to be suggesting... or i suppose there was intent but at least the process of interpretation was never this straightforward.. it was always noisy... artworks always had a life of their own, separate from the authors initial intentions..

azrael_crying

14/11/2041 at 13:22

well ok sure but dont you think these kinds of conversations still made more sense there?

yyatima

14/11/2041 at 13:48

not really, no. in a certain sense i dont think anything really changed..

zer0c00l

14/11/2041 at 14:30

i think this is a much wider conversation.. maybe we can move this to a dedicated log? threadcan of worms